The NBA’s latest controversy involves a player biting another player. This has led to a lot of discussion about whether or not this is acceptable behavior in the NBA.
The player who was bitten, Deandre Jordan, is a center for the Los Angeles Clippers. The player who bit him, Austin Rivers, is a guard for the Houston Rockets. The incident occurred during a game between the two teams on January 15, 2018.
Jordan was attempting to block a shot by Rivers when Rivers bit him on the finger. Jordan was visibly shaken by the incident and had to be helped off the court by his teammates.
Rivers was given a technical foul for the incident. After the game, he issued a public apology to Jordan.
This is not the first time that Rivers has been involved in a biting incident. In 2015, he was suspended for one game after biting the hand of then-teammate Reggie Evans during a game.
The NBA has not yet announced if they will take any further action against Rivers for this most recent incident.
Some people feel that biting is a form of assault and that Rivers should be suspended for his actions. Others feel that the incident was not serious enough to warrant a suspension.
What do you think? Should the NBA suspend Austin Rivers for biting Deandre Jordan?
How the NBA Is Dealing With This Strange Incident
The news of an NBA player biting another player on the court has been making headlines around the world. The incident took place during a game between the Houston Rockets and the Los Angeles Lakers, when Rockets’ player, Montrezl Harrell, allegedly bit Lakers’ player, Brandon Ingram, on the arm.
The NBA is currently investigating the incident and has not yet made a decision on whether or not to discipline either player. The league is taking the matter very seriously, as biting is considered a form of physical violence and is not tolerated.
The incident has caused a lot of controversies, with many people wondering if the NBA is doing enough to punish players who commit such acts. Some have even called for harsher punishments, such as suspensions or even bans from the league.
What do you think the NBA should do in this situation? Should they hand out harsher punishments for players who commit physical violence on the court? Or do you think this is an isolated incident that doesn’t warrant such measures?
Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
The Aftermath of the Bite and What It Means for the League
It’s been a little over a week since the now-infamous “ice cream bite” incident occurred between Houston Rockets’ center Dwight Howard and Los Angeles Lakers’ forward Kobe Bryant. The two were involved in a scuffle during a game on January 7th, which resulted in Howard getting a small chunk of ice cream on his shoulder. Bryant was suspended for two games without pay by the NBA shortly after the incident.
The question now is, what does the aftermath of the bite mean for the league?
For one, it’s a black mark on an already tarnished image. The NBA has been embroiled in a number of controversies over the past few years, including the Tim Donaghy betting scandal and the recent Highly Sensitive Information (HSI) leak. This latest incident is just another example of how the league can be perceived as being out of touch with its players and its fans.
It also raises questions about the NBA’s disciplinary process. How can a player be suspended for two games without pay for an incident that didn’t result in any physical injury? And why wasn’t Howard given a similar punishment?
These are valid questions that the NBA will need to answer in the coming days and weeks. In the meantime, the league will continue to be scrutinized by the media and the public. And the “ice cream bite” incident will no doubt be used as ammunition by those who are critical of the NBA.
What This Means for the Players Involved and Their Careers
The NBA has seen its fair share of player movement this offseason. With the likes of Kyrie Irving, Jimmy Butler, and Paul George being traded, and LeBron James, DeMarcus Cousins, and Julius Randle signing with new teams, it seems like everyone is on the move.
But what does this all mean for the players involved and their careers?
For starters, let’s take a look at the players who have been traded. Kyrie Irving was the big name in the deal that sent him from the Cleveland Cavaliers to the Boston Celtics. He’s only 25 years old and is already a four-time All-Star. He’s also one of the best point guards in the league.
So, what does this trade mean for Irving’s career?
Well, it’s hard to say. On one hand, he’s leaving a situation in Cleveland where he was the clear-cut number-one option. He was the face of the franchise and the team was built around him. In Boston, he’ll be joining a team that already has an established star in All-Star point guard Isaiah Thomas.
So, while Irving will still be a very important part of the Celtics, he may not be the focal point of the offense like he was in Cleveland.
On the other hand, this trade could be exactly what Irving needs. He’s going to a situation in Boston where he can learn from one of the best coaches in the league Brad Stevens. He’ll also be playing with a much better-supporting cast, as the Celtics have a deep and talented roster.
So, while there may be some adjustments for Irving, this trade could end up being a positive for his career in the long run.
Next, let’s take a look at the players who have signed with new teams. The biggest name in this group is LeBron James, who left the Cavaliers to sign with the Los Angeles Lakers. James is easily the best player in the world and is coming off yet another MVP season.
So, what does this move mean for James and his career?
Well, it’s hard to say. On one hand, James is leaving a situation in Cleveland where he